Models

gemini-robotics-er-2-preview

gemini · 131K ctx · 1 providers · updated 2026-10-13 04:15 UTC

Cheapest
$2.00 Official list · Gemini
Avg price
$2.00 /1M
providers
1
(3 × $1.00 + $5.00) ÷ 4 = $2.00/1M — the $/1M figure blends input and output at 3:1 — that is the only way models with two different rates can be ranked on one axis. Your actual rate depends on your own input:output mix — input only $1.00, 3:1 $2.00, 1:1 $3.00, output only $5.00 per 1M.

The board shows this model's cheapest measured offer ($2.00/1M); the smaller figure under it is the mean of the 3 offers listed below ($2.00/1M). Add those up and divide — it matches.

ProviderRouter / Source$ in /1M$ out /1MTTFTTPSUptimeEvidence
gemini Pricebook (LiteLLM) ↗ $1.00$5.00 — — — Official list
vertex_ai Pricebook (LiteLLM) ↗ $1.00$5.00 — — — Official list
vertex_ai-language-models Pricebook (LiteLLM) ↗ $1.00$5.00 — — — Official list

Price trend

Cheapest blended price, last 31 days (USD/1M): $4 → $4 → $4 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2 → $2

Data & method

Cheapest ranked by blended = (3×in + out) ÷ 4; performance columns show only when a source provides them, never estimated. “Official list” = LiteLLM open pricebook (MIT); “API-measured” = provider/aggregator public APIs. Machine-readable data: /api/v1/models/gemini-robotics-er-2-preview.json. Free reuse requires attribution to tkx.org.

FAQ

How much does gemini-robotics-er-2-preview cost?

Cheapest measured offer right now: $1/1M input, $5/1M output via gemini — across 1 tracked providers, refreshed hourly.

Who serves gemini-robotics-er-2-preview?

1 providers currently serve it. The table above lists each with input/output price, TTFT, TPS, uptime and an evidence tier.

Is the price of gemini-robotics-er-2-preview going up or down?

The daily candles above track the cheapest blended price ($/1M, 3:1 in:out). TKX snapshots every hour, so drops and hikes show up the same day they happen.

Related analysis

Back to rankings